Hi,
Building dpdk app. as a shared library (.so) I believe is supported but I
can't find any documentation for it. I tried doing the same Makefile
format as building an app, and that is placed the following:
rte.vars.mk -> before everything
rte.extshared.mk ---> after everythin
Hi Alexander,
Regarding your following statement --
"
The only drop counter quickly increasing in the case of pure ACK flood is
ierrors, while rx_nombuf remains zero.
"
Can you please explain the significance of "ierrors" counter since I am not
familiar with that.
Further, you said you have 4
Hi,
I have used DPDK1.4 and DPDK1.5 and the packets do fan out nicely on the rx
queues nicely in some usecases I have.
Alexander, can you please try using DPDK1.4 or 1.5 and share the results.
Regards
-Prashant
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wan
Hi,
02/11/2013 07:24, Jose Gavine Cueto :
> Building dpdk app. as a shared library (.so) I believe is supported but I
> can't find any documentation for it. I tried doing the same Makefile
> format as building an app, and that is placed the following:
>
> rte.vars.mk -> before everythi
Hi,
We are developing an App over DPDK and in one scenario with SR-IOV with
one of the VFs mapped to a VM and DPDK running on the VM, we see that the
packets are not coming on the wire but I get the following debug logs for
every packet transmitted. We are getting the same format of packets on t
Sorry pressed the send button too soon. The NIC Card we are using is
Intel Corporation 82576 Virtual Function (rev 01)
Do we need to do now NIC/CPU low level debugging or is there some issue in
the sw that could cause the packet to be dropped below this log message.
PMD: eth_igb_xmit_pkts(): por
6 matches
Mail list logo