Hello,
09/05/2013 16:05, Jo?o Alberto Pereira de Ara?jo :
> Cause: No probed ethernet devices
[..]
> I have a board with 6 Gigabit ethernet ports (82574L) with the latest
> driver from intel.
As you can see in lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_dev_ids.h,
the NIC 82574L is not supported in thi
- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20130510/cfbbe9c4/attachment.html>
> The rte_eth_dev_count() call returns 0, I am using a CentOS 6.3 Virtual
> Machine on VMWare esxi 5.0 on a Cisco UCS C220 M3 which comes with Xeon
> E5-2600.
Can you run lspci -vt and send us the output?
Best regards,
Vincent
the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message
and all copies from
your system. Thank you.
---
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20130510/7025db56/attachment.html>
ge and all copies from
> your system. Thank you.
> ---
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20130510/bae8dff3/attachment.html>
On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Bhavesh Davda wrote:
> ESXi 5.0 doesn't have SR-IOV support (it's in the code, but is disabled and
> not usable for customers). VMware introduced SR-IOV support, including out of
> the box support for Intel Niantic 10GbE NICs, in ESXi 5.1.
>
You can u
Right: VMware has supported VMDirectPath passthrough since ESXi 4.0, on any
platform with an IOMMU (Intel VT-d) which is anything Nehalem Xeons or newer.
I know this is a DPDK forum, but Stephen, if you know of specific limitations
of ESXi 5.1's SR-IOV support, please let me know and I'll make s
On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Bhavesh Davda wrote:
> Right: VMware has supported VMDirectPath passthrough since ESXi 4.0, on any
> platform with an IOMMU (Intel VT-d) which is anything Nehalem Xeons or newer.
>
> I know this is a DPDK forum, but Stephen, if you know of specific limit
Hi Stephen,
I checked both our hypervisor code and with the experts who wrote and maintain
the code, and we don't have any such limitation about not supporting SR-IOV if
the motherboard or device doesn't support PCIe ASPM.
If you can point me to the Intel person(s) who gave you that information
On Fri, 10 May 2013 12:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Bhavesh Davda wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I checked both our hypervisor code and with the experts who wrote and
> maintain the code, and we don't have any such limitation about not supporting
> SR-IOV if the motherboard or device doesn't support PCIe ASPM.
> From: "Stephen Hemminger"
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 12:29:29 PM
>
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 12:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
> Bhavesh Davda wrote:
>
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > I checked both our hypervisor code and with the experts who wrote and
> > maintain the code, and we don't have any such limitation
11 matches
Mail list logo