Re: SIGILL in rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled / RTE_CPUFLAG_RTM

2023-09-25 Thread Bernd Schubert
On 9/22/23 20:02, Bernd Schubert wrote: This already has been reported here https://inbox.dpdk.org/users/c7ff2508-d633-404e-95af-5f604d8e8...@intel.com/t/ but I don't see a solution there. It just ends up asking for the line numbers. Well, the line is Sorry for the noise, it was actually ou

Re: SIGILL in rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled / RTE_CPUFLAG_RTM

2023-09-25 Thread David Marchand
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 7:48 PM Bernd Schubert wrote: > > I'm trying to compile our tools on an older lab system and get > > Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. > 0x7434c766 in rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled > (feature=feature@entry=RTE_CPUFLAG_RTM) at ../lib/eal/x86/rte_cpufla

Re: SIGILL in rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled / RTE_CPUFLAG_RTM

2023-09-22 Thread Bernd Schubert
This already has been reported here https://inbox.dpdk.org/users/c7ff2508-d633-404e-95af-5f604d8e8...@intel.com/t/ but I don't see a solution there. It just ends up asking for the line numbers. Well, the line is __cpuid_count(feat->leaf, feat->subleaf, regs[RTE_REG_EAX], r

SIGILL in rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled / RTE_CPUFLAG_RTM

2023-09-22 Thread Bernd Schubert
Hello, I'm trying to compile our tools on an older lab system and get Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0x7434c766 in rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled (feature=feature@entry=RTE_CPUFLAG_RTM) at ../lib/eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c:173 173 return (regs[feat->reg] >> feat-