> > >
> > > On 2022-10-06 10:18, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > >> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 09.51
> > > >>
> > > >> On 2022-10-06 08:53, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > >>> I have been wondering how
Morten Brørup writes:
>> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2022 23.34
>>
>> On 2022-10-05 22:52, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> > 05/10/2022 22:33, Mattias Rönnblom:
>> >> On 2022-10-05 21:14, David Marchand wrote:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>>
>> >>>
From: Lincoln Lavoie [mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu]
Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 13.07
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:49 AM Morten Brørup
> wrote:
> > From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 10.59
> >
> > On 2022-10-06 10:18, Morten Brørup w
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:49 AM Morten Brørup
wrote:
> > From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 10.59
> >
> > On 2022-10-06 10:18, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > >> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
> > >> Sent: Thursd
> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 10.59
>
> On 2022-10-06 10:18, Morten Brørup wrote:
> >> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 09.51
> >>
> >> On 2022-10-06 08:53, Morten Br
On 2022-10-06 10:18, Morten Brørup wrote:
>> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 09.51
>>
>> On 2022-10-06 08:53, Morten Brørup wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I have been wondering how accurate the tests really are. Where can I
>> see what is be
> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 09.51
>
> On 2022-10-06 08:53, Morten Brørup wrote:
[...]
> > I have been wondering how accurate the tests really are. Where can I
> see what is being done to ensure that the EAL worker threads are f
On 2022-10-06 08:53, Morten Brørup wrote:
>> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2022 23.34
>>
>> On 2022-10-05 22:52, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 05/10/2022 22:33, Mattias Rönnblom:
On 2022-10-05 21:14, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello,
+CC: DTS mailing list.
> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 09.05
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:53 AM Morten Brørup
> wrote:
[...]
> > Forgive me, if I am sidetracking a bit here... The issue discussed
> seems to be related to some threads w
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:53 AM Morten Brørup wrote:
>
> > From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2022 23.34
> >
> > On 2022-10-05 22:52, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 05/10/2022 22:33, Mattias Rönnblom:
> > >> On 2022-10-05 21:14, David Marchand
> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2022 23.34
>
> On 2022-10-05 22:52, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 05/10/2022 22:33, Mattias Rönnblom:
> >> On 2022-10-05 21:14, David Marchand wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> The service_autotest unit test ha
On 2022-10-05 22:52, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 05/10/2022 22:33, Mattias Rönnblom:
>> On 2022-10-05 21:14, David Marchand wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The service_autotest unit test has been failing randomly.
>>> This is not something new.
>>> We have been fixing this unit test and the service code, he
05/10/2022 22:33, Mattias Rönnblom:
> On 2022-10-05 21:14, David Marchand wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The service_autotest unit test has been failing randomly.
> > This is not something new.
> > We have been fixing this unit test and the service code, here and there.
> > For some time we were "fine"
On 2022-10-05 21:14, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The service_autotest unit test has been failing randomly.
> This is not something new.
> We have been fixing this unit test and the service code, here and there.
> For some time we were "fine": the failures were rare.
>
> But recenly (for th
14 matches
Mail list logo