RE: rte_atomic API compatibility & standard atomics

2023-03-29 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 28 March 2023 20.46 > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 10:08:10PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: > > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > > Sent: Monday, 27 March 2023 21.39 > > > > > > Hi folks, > > >

Re: rte_atomic API compatibility & standard atomics

2023-03-28 Thread Tyler Retzlaff
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 10:08:10PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > Sent: Monday, 27 March 2023 21.39 > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I don't think we discussed it specifically but what is the expectation > > in relation to converting to sta

RE: rte_atomic API compatibility & standard atomics

2023-03-27 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > Sent: Monday, 27 March 2023 21.39 > > Hi folks, > > I don't think we discussed it specifically but what is the expectation > in relation to converting to standard atomics and compatibility of the > legacy rte_atomic APIs? > > We can'