On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 10:28:21 +0100
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Last time I looked at that code it was really ugly, and messy. But
> more of importantly it was the wrong use case. Very few users will
> want to have a NIC dedicated to capture only.
>
> The whole thing should be rewritten so that tcp
Last time I looked at that code it was really ugly, and messy. But more of
importantly it was the wrong use case. Very few users will want to have a
NIC dedicated to capture only.
The whole thing should be rewritten so that tcpdump/ Wireshark can run as
secondary process using existing pdump API.
2 matches
Mail list logo
