01/07/2024 11:27, Ruifeng Wang:
>
> On 2024/6/28 11:22 AM, Yutang Jiang wrote:
> > The AmpereOneAC04 is efficient Cloud Native CPU:
> >Up to 192 Cores
> >2MB Private L2 Cache per Core
> >8 channel DDR5
> >128 lanes PCIe Gen5
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yutang Jiang
>
> Acked-by: Ruif
On 2024/6/28 11:22 AM, Yutang Jiang wrote:
The AmpereOneAC04 is efficient Cloud Native CPU:
Up to 192 Cores
2MB Private L2 Cache per Core
8 channel DDR5
128 lanes PCIe Gen5
Signed-off-by: Yutang Jiang
---
config/arm/arm64_ampereoneac04_linux_gcc | 17 +
config/a
Due to changes in product family naming conventions, this updated version has
no other changes except for some string adjustments.
Hi Thomas,
According to your suggestion, this version has also added a small description
of the platform.
Best Regards,
Yutang Jiang
> -Original Message-
Advantech ICVG x86 Software
02-7732-3399 Ext. 1249
-Original Message-
From: Ferruh Yigit
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2024 4:58 PM
To: Jack.Chen ; dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Amy.Shih ; bill.lu ;
Jenny3.Lin ; Bruce Richardson
; Mcnamara, John
Subject: Re: DPDK patch for Amston Lake SGMII <> GPY215
; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Amy.Shih ; bill.lu ;
> Jenny3.Lin ; Bruce Richardson
> ; Mcnamara, John
> Subject: Re: DPDK patch for Amston Lake SGMII <> GPY215
>
> On 5/24/2024 6:40 AM, Jack.Chen wrote:
>> Dear DPDK Dev .
>>
>> This is PM from Advantech ENPD. We
On 5/24/2024 6:40 AM, Jack.Chen wrote:
> Dear DPDK Dev .
>
> This is PM from Advantech ENPD. We are working on Intel Amston Lake
> CPU’s SGMII <> GPY215 PHY for DPDK test but fail.
>
> We consulted with Intel support team and they suggested we should
> consult DPDK community and it should have t
On 26-09-2023 17:04, Aaron Conole wrote:
Okay - we typically don't use pull requests. If you and others are are
okay, I can take the patches and repost them to the ML from the pull
requests with a note indicating such.
Yes please; that would be helpful.
Thanks, John
John Romein writes:
> Dear Elena, Aaron,
Hi John,
> I hope you had a nice time after the DPDK workshop.
>
> I was unable to solve the issues with our mailserver to submit a patch
> with git sendmail. So I created a pull request:
> https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/pull/69
> @Elena, could you plea
07/04/2022 16:51, Marcin Danilewicz:
> Added changes after review and increased throughput.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Danilewicz
I think these changes should be squashed with the first patch.
You need to version your patches also:
this one should have been v2, next one should be v3.
And while a
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcin Danilewicz
> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 3:52 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ajmera, Megha
> Subject: [dpdk][PATCH 1/2] sched: enable/disable TC OV at runtime
>
> From: Megha Ajmera
>
> Added new API to enable or disable TC over subscription for be
10 matches
Mail list logo
