RE: C11 atomics adoption blocked

2023-08-16 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 16 August 2023 19.26 > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 05:13:04PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > > Sent: Monday, 14 August 2023 15.46 > > > > > > mercredi 9 août 2023

Re: C11 atomics adoption blocked

2023-08-16 Thread Tyler Retzlaff
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 05:13:04PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > Sent: Monday, 14 August 2023 15.46 > > > > mercredi 9 août 2023, Morten Brørup: > > > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 8 Augu

RE: C11 atomics adoption blocked

2023-08-14 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > Sent: Monday, 14 August 2023 15.46 > > mercredi 9 août 2023, Morten Brørup: > > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, 8 August 2023 22.50 > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Morten

Re: C11 atomics adoption blocked

2023-08-14 Thread Thomas Monjalon
mercredi 9 août 2023, Morten Brørup: > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, 8 August 2023 22.50 > > > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: > > > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > > > Sent: Tuesday

RE: C11 atomics adoption blocked

2023-08-09 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 8 August 2023 22.50 > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: > > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, 8 August 2023 21.20 > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 08,

Re: C11 atomics adoption blocked

2023-08-08 Thread Tyler Retzlaff
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, 8 August 2023 21.20 > > > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 07:23:41PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:53:03AM -0700, Tyler Retzl

RE: C11 atomics adoption blocked

2023-08-08 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 8 August 2023 21.20 > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 07:23:41PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:53:03AM -0700, Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > Moving this discussion to the dev

Re: C11 atomics adoption blocked

2023-08-08 Thread Tyler Retzlaff
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 07:23:41PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:53:03AM -0700, Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Moving this discussion to the dev mailing list for broader comment. > > > > Unfortunately, we've hit a roadblock with integrating C11 atomics >

Re: C11 atomics adoption blocked

2023-08-08 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:53:03AM -0700, Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > Hi folks, > > Moving this discussion to the dev mailing list for broader comment. > > Unfortunately, we've hit a roadblock with integrating C11 atomics > for DPDK. The main issue is that GNU C++ prior to -std=c++23 explicitly > ca