On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 11:18:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 02/11/2020 16:00, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:40:54AM +, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> > > Hi Bruce,
> > >
> > > I was able to pin this down on drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c. Removing
> > > -fPIC from its ninja rec
On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 11:18 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 02/11/2020 16:00, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:40:54AM +, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> > > Hi Bruce,
> > >
> > > I was able to pin this down on drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c. Removing
> > > -fPIC from its ninja recipe in
02/11/2020 16:00, Bruce Richardson:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:40:54AM +, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > I was able to pin this down on drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c. Removing -fPIC
> > from its ninja recipe in build.ninja resolves the issue (had to prevent
> > creating shared li
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:40:54AM +, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> I was able to pin this down on drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c. Removing -fPIC
> from its ninja recipe in build.ninja resolves the issue (had to prevent
> creating shared libs in this case).
> What do you suggest I do? Ca
gt; To: Bruce Richardson
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> > ; Asaf Penso
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] performance degradation with fpic
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Bruce Richardson
> > > Sent: Thursday, Octobe
> -Original Message-
> From: Ali Alnubani
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 5:17 PM
> To: Bruce Richardson
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> ; Asaf Penso
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] performance degradation with fpic
>
> > -Original Message--
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 4:58 PM
> To: Ali Alnubani
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> ; Asaf Penso
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] performance degradation with fpic
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 20
NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> > ; Asaf Penso
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] performance degradation with fpic
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:47:48AM +, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> > > Hi Bruce,
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > &
Hi Bruce,
Sorry for the delayed response.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 4:02 PM
> To: Ali Alnubani
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> ; Asaf Penso
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] performance degradation
; ; Asaf Penso
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] performance degradation with fpic
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 04:00:44PM +, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> > > >Hi Bruce,
> > > >
Hi Bruce,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 12:59 PM
> To: Ali Alnubani
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> ; Asaf Penso
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] performance degradation with fpic
>
> On Thu, Oct 1
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 04:00:44PM +, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> >Hi Bruce,
> >
> >
> >We have been seeing in some cases that the DPDK forwarding performance
> >is up to 9% lower when DPDK is built as static with meson
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 02:44:49PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:14:48 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> > 15/10/2020 19:08, Bruce Richardson:
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 04:00:44PM +, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> > > >We have been seeing in some cases that the DP
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:14:48 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 15/10/2020 19:08, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 04:00:44PM +, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> > >We have been seeing in some cases that the DPDK forwarding performance
> > >is up to 9% lower when DPDK is built as stat
15/10/2020 19:08, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 04:00:44PM +, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> >We have been seeing in some cases that the DPDK forwarding performance
> >is up to 9% lower when DPDK is built as static with meson compared to a
> >build with makefiles.
> >
> >T
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 04:00:44PM +, Ali Alnubani wrote:
>Hi Bruce,
>
>
>We have been seeing in some cases that the DPDK forwarding performance
>is up to 9% lower when DPDK is built as static with meson compared to a
>build with makefiles.
>
>
>The same degradation can
16 matches
Mail list logo
