:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wu, Jingjing
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 1:47 AM
> To: Hanoch Haim (hhaim)
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] net/i40e: latency issue due fix interrupt
> throttling setting in PF
>
> Hi, Hanoch
>
> Thanks a lot for
On Behalf Of Wu, Jingjing
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 1:47 AM
> To: Hanoch Haim (hhaim)
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] net/i40e: latency issue due fix interrupt throttling
> setting in PF
>
> Hi, Hanoch
>
> Thanks a lot for the trying. Are you usin
017 12:48 AM
To: Wu, Jingjing mailto:jingjing...@intel.com>>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>; Hanoch Haim (hhaim)
mailto:hh...@cisco.com>>
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] net/i40e: latency issue due fix interrupt throttling
setting in PF
Hi Jingjing,
I did that and see the resu
From: Hanoch Haim (hhaim) [mailto:hh...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 12:48 AM
To: Wu, Jingjing
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hanoch Haim (hhaim)
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] net/i40e: latency issue due fix interrupt throttling
setting in PF
Hi Jingjing,
I did that and see the results, It does not
...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 5:01 PM
To: Hanoch Haim (hhaim)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] net/i40e: latency issue due fix interrupt throttling
setting in PF
Hi, Hanoch
If DPDK PF, the commit affects that because it introduces an argument (itr_idx)
for i40e_vsi_ena
Hi, Hanoh
Yes, that's true.
Thanks
Jingjing
From: Hanoch Haim (hhaim) [mailto:hh...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:07 PM
To: Wu, Jingjing
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] net/i40e: latency issue due fix interrupt throttling
setting in PF
Hi Jinjing,
So to v
From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 5:01 PM
To: Hanoch Haim (hhaim)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] net/i40e: latency issue due fix interrupt throttling
setting in PF
Hi, Hanoch
If DPDK PF, the commit affects that because it introduces an argumen
ngjing
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hanoch Haim (hhaim)
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] net/i40e: latency issue due fix interrupt throttling
setting in PF
Hi Jingjing,
1. The issue is with DPDK PF.
2. The rate is high ~10gb, one DP core, one latency core.
3. The fix is here
/* Bind all RX queues to
patch and fix this latency issue in the different way?
Thanks,
Hanoh
From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 2:50 PM
To: Hanoch Haim (hhaim); dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] net/i40e: latency issue due fix interrupt throttling
setting in PF
Hi, Ha
.com]
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2017 7:25 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Wu, Jingjing
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] net/i40e: latency issue due fix interrupt throttling
setting in PF
Re-sending
Hanoh
From: Hanoch Haim (hhaim)
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 5:19 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
Re-sending
Hanoh
From: Hanoch Haim (hhaim)
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 5:19 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Wu, Jingjing (jingjing...@intel.com); Hanoch Haim (hhaim)
Subject: [dpdk-dev] net/i40e: latency issue due fix interrupt throttling
setting in PF
Hi All,
While integrating dpdk17.11 into TRex
11 matches
Mail list logo
