Re: [dpdk-dev] Regarding HQOS with run-to-completion Model

Thanks Stephen. While browsing the DPDK qos code, i figured out that existing PIPE-PROFILE cannot be updated or deleted at run time. Was there any reason why this limitation ? Thanks Farooq.J On Thu, 22 May, 2025, 20:51 Stephen Hemminger, wrote: > On Thu, 22 May 2025 08:15:14 +053

Re: [dpdk-dev] Regarding HQOS with run-to-completion Model

On Tue, 27 May 2025 21:09:57 +0530 farooq basha wrote: > Thanks Stephen. > > While browsing the DPDK qos code, i figured out that existing > PIPE-PROFILE cannot be updated or deleted at run time. > Was there any reason why this limitation ? My understanding was that the original au

Re: [dpdk-dev] Regarding HQOS with run-to-completion Model

On Thu, 22 May 2025 08:15:14 +0530 farooq basha wrote: > Thanks Stephen for addressing my queries , and it is helpful. > > One more follow up question on the same , Can DPDK HQOS be customized > based on Use case ? > > For example: Hqos config for one of the use cases , *One Port , O

Re: [dpdk-dev] Regarding HQOS with run-to-completion Model

Thanks Stephen for addressing my queries , and it is helpful. One more follow up question on the same , Can DPDK HQOS be customized based on Use case ? For example: Hqos config for one of the use cases , *One Port , One Subport , 16 Pipes & Each Pipe with only one TC*.

Re: [dpdk-dev] Regarding HQOS with run-to-completion Model

On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:55:07 +0530 farooq basha wrote: > Hello DevTeam, > > I am planning to use DPDK HQOS for Traffic shaping with a > run-to-completion Model. While I was reading the dpdk-qos document, I came > across the following statement. > > "*Running enqueue and dequeue operations f