Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-29 Thread Varghese, Vipin
Hi Dikshant, Summarizing the contents from earlier mails below 1. Issue-1 shared with PDUMP not working with testpmd - solution shared and suggested what needs to be added to fix the same. 2. Issue-2 shared for custom Makefile for application not working - pointed out possible cause and missin

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-29 Thread Dikshant Chitkara
ect treated as a separate test module. Thanks, Dikshant -Original Message- From: Varghese, Vipin Sent: 29 July 2020 15:21 To: Dikshant Chitkara ; Stephen Hemminger Cc: us...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; Amir Ilan ; Veeresh Patil Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue Hi Dikshant, Look

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-29 Thread Dikshant Chitkara
...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; Amir Ilan ; Veeresh Patil Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue NOT FROM AIRSPAN - Caution - External from: vipin.vargh...@intel.com Snipped > Hi Team, > > With fix suggest in prev mail thread at testpmd side, PDUMP works with > testpmd. > > Howe

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-29 Thread Varghese, Vipin
Couple more request, 1. please avoid ` NOT FROM AIRSPAN - Caution - External ` headers & banners. 2. If possible, use `snip` or `snipped` to remove clutter and bring foucs Snipped > Hi Dikshant, > > Looks like the custom Makefile log is quite different in passing DPDK CFLAGS > and LDFLAGS. Al

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-29 Thread Varghese, Vipin
the content and format intact for my custom makefile. > -Original Message- > From: Dikshant Chitkara > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 2:44 PM > To: Varghese, Vipin ; Stephen Hemminger > > Cc: us...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; Amir Ilan ; Veeresh > Patil > Subject: R

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-29 Thread Dikshant Chitkara
mitted to vdev: 0 -packets freed:0 [root@flexran3 x86_64-native-linux-icc]# -Original Message- From: Varghese, Vipin Sent: 22 July 2020 09:38 To: Stephen Hemminger ; Dikshant Chitkara Cc: us...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; Amir Ilan ; Veeresh Patil Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] DP

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-29 Thread Dikshant Chitkara
pdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; Amir Ilan ; Veeresh Patil Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue NOT FROM AIRSPAN - Caution - External from: step...@networkplumber.org On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:41:38 + Dikshant Chitkara wrote: > Hi Stephen, > Our system has 2 sockets as seen from below : >

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-29 Thread Dikshant Chitkara
:20 Socket(s): 2 NUMA node(s): 2 -Original Message- From: Stephen Hemminger Sent: 28 July 2020 21:54 To: Dikshant Chitkara Cc: Varghese, Vipin ; us...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; Amir Ilan ; Veeresh Patil Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue NOT FROM AIRSPAN

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-28 Thread Varghese, Vipin
Snipped > Hi Team, > > With fix suggest in prev mail thread at testpmd side, PDUMP works with > testpmd. > > However when we try to run our own primary app with PDUMP as a secondary > process, PDUMP console comes up, however it does not capture any packets. > > Changes made at primary app side:

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-28 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:41:38 + Dikshant Chitkara wrote: > Hi Stephen, > Our system has 2 sockets as seen from below : > > [root@flexran3 dchitkara]# lscpu > Architecture: x86_64 > CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit > Byte Order:Little Endian > CPU(s):8

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-28 Thread Stephen Hemminger
probe driver: 8086:158b net_i40e > Port 1 MAC: 02 70 63 61 70 00 > core (0), capture for (1) tuples > - port 0 device ((null)) queue 65535 > ^C > > Signal 2 received, preparing to exit... > # PDUMP DEBUG STATS # > -packets dequeued: 0

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-21 Thread Varghese, Vipin
Snipped > Dikshant Chitkara wrote: > > > Hi Team, > > > > We are facing an issue w.r.t to using DPDK PDUMP utility and want to check > > if > you can help us in this regard. > > > > This issue is specific to DPDK 19.05 version or may be newer versions and > was not found on DPDK 18.08 version.

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK PDUMP Issue

2020-07-14 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:40:55 + Dikshant Chitkara wrote: > Hi Team, > > We are facing an issue w.r.t to using DPDK PDUMP utility and want to check if > you can help us in this regard. > > This issue is specific to DPDK 19.05 version or may be newer versions and > was not found on DPDK 18.