n, Bruce ;
Stephen Hemminger ; 'Mattias Rönnblom'
; Shaw, Jeffrey B
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Compiler for Windows
Any update about the progress, please?
Do you have started a new branch?
30/01/2019 17:32, Menon, Ranjit:
> Thank you for the direction, Thomas and Tech Board member
ry 30, 2019 6:21 AM
> To: 'Jason Messer' ; 'Harini Ramakrishnan'
> ; 'Omar Cardona' ;
> Menon, Ranjit
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Burakov, Anatoly ; Richardson,
> Bruce ; Stephen Hemminger
> ; 'Mattias Rönnblom'
> ; Shaw, Jeffrey B ;
>
-
>>> From: Thomas Monjalon
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 6:21 AM
>>> To: 'Jason Messer' ; 'Harini Ramakrishnan'
>>> ; 'Omar Cardona'
>>> ; Menon, Ranjit
>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Burakov, Anatoly ; Ric
@dpdk.org; Burakov, Anatoly ; Richardson,
> > Bruce ; Stephen Hemminger
> > ; 'Mattias Rönnblom'
> > ; Shaw, Jeffrey B
> > ; techbo...@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Compiler for Windows
> >
> > 08/01/2019 11:24, Burakov, Anatoly:
>
tephen Hemminger
> ; 'Mattias Rönnblom'
> ; Shaw, Jeffrey B ;
> techbo...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Compiler for Windows
>
> 08/01/2019 11:24, Burakov, Anatoly:
>>> On 07-Jan-19 5:08 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 07/01/2019 18:00, Bruce R
, Ranjit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Burakov, Anatoly ; Richardson,
Bruce ; Stephen Hemminger
; 'Mattias Rönnblom'
; Shaw, Jeffrey B ;
techbo...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Compiler for Windows
08/01/2019 11:24, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 07-Jan-19 5:08 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
08/01/2019 11:24, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 07-Jan-19 5:08 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 07/01/2019 18:00, Bruce Richardson:
> >> I think for windows we probably want to start with the MS compiler first,
> >> since from my understanding it's probably the default go-to compiler for
> >> developers on
On 2019-01-08 13:51, Morten Brørup wrote:
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
I think for windows we probably want to start with the MS compiler
first,
since from my understanding it's probably the default go-to compiler
for
developers on windows, and look at alt
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> I think for windows we probably want to start with the MS compiler
> first,
> since from my understanding it's probably the default go-to compiler
> for
> developers on windows, and look at alternatives from there.
>
> /Bruc
On 07-Jan-19 5:08 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
07/01/2019 18:00, Bruce Richardson:
I think for windows we probably want to start with the MS compiler first,
since from my understanding it's probably the default go-to compiler for
developers on windows, and look at alternatives from there.
Not su
07/01/2019 18:00, Bruce Richardson:
> I think for windows we probably want to start with the MS compiler first,
> since from my understanding it's probably the default go-to compiler for
> developers on windows, and look at alternatives from there.
Not sure. I feel clang is a better option.
This
07/01/2019 17:51, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:29:25 +
> "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
>
> > On 07-Jan-19 4:15 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:51:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:56:57 +
> > >> "Burakov, Anatoly" w
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 08:51:25AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:29:25 +
> "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
>
> > On 07-Jan-19 4:15 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:51:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:56:57 +000
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:29:25 +
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> On 07-Jan-19 4:15 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:51:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:56:57 +
> >> "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 03-Jan-19 6:33 AM, Stephen He
On 07-Jan-19 4:15 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:51:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:56:57 +
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
On 03-Jan-19 6:33 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
What about Gcc under the WSL thing (ie Linux emulation in Windows).
Much
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:51:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:56:57 +
> "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
>
> > On 03-Jan-19 6:33 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > What about Gcc under the WSL thing (ie Linux emulation in Windows).
> > > Much better than Cygwin type stuf
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:56:57 +
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> On 03-Jan-19 6:33 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > What about Gcc under the WSL thing (ie Linux emulation in Windows).
> > Much better than Cygwin type stuff.
> >
>
> WSL is dog-slow with any kind of disk I/O, at least currently, s
On 03-Jan-19 6:33 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
What about Gcc under the WSL thing (ie Linux emulation in Windows).
Much better than Cygwin type stuff.
WSL is dog-slow with any kind of disk I/O, at least currently, so while
i do use WSL to fool my IDE into thinking it's running on Linux, the
> On Jan 3, 2019, at 11:10 AM, Jason Messer wrote:
>
> +Jeffrey, Manasi
>
> We will get the most traction from the Windows developer community if we use
> msvc. The only thing preventing that last time was GNU extensions used in
> DPDK source which were not ISO C standards compliant. We were
Hi Jason,
We need to get facts in order to do a good decision.
Please, let's give detailed feedback for each option.
03/01/2019 18:10, Jason Messer:
> +Jeffrey, Manasi
>
> We will get the most traction from the Windows developer community
> if we use msvc. The only thing preventing that last tim
+Jeffrey, Manasi
We will get the most traction from the Windows developer community if we use
msvc. The only thing preventing that last time was GNU extensions used in DPDK
source which were not ISO C standards compliant. We were also experimenting
with Clang/LLVM running natively on Windows ho
What about Gcc under the WSL thing (ie Linux emulation in Windows).
Much better than Cygwin type stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 2:45 PM
To: Jason Messer ; Harini Ramakrishnan
; Omar Cardona ;
Ranjit Menon
Cc: Mattias Rönnblom ; Jeff Sha
22 matches
Mail list logo
