On 6/16/20 11:45 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:52:01 -0400
> Chas Williams <3ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/16/20 7:48 AM, Jay Rolette wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:52 PM Stephen Hemminger <
>> > step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am distu
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:52:01 -0400
Chas Williams <3ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/16/20 7:48 AM, Jay Rolette wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:52 PM Stephen Hemminger <
> > step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I am disturbed by the wide spread use of master/slave in Ethernet
On 6/16/20 7:48 AM, Jay Rolette wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:52 PM Stephen Hemminger <
> step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
>> I am disturbed by the wide spread use of master/slave in Ethernet
bonding.
>> Asked the current IEEE chairs and it looks like it is already fixed
>> "upstream
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:52 PM Stephen Hemminger <
step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> I am disturbed by the wide spread use of master/slave in Ethernet bonding.
> Asked the current IEEE chairs and it looks like it is already fixed
> "upstream".
>
> The proper terminology is for Ethernet link ag
On 6/15/20 6:52 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I am disturbed by the wide spread use of master/slave in Ethernet
bonding.
> Asked the current IEEE chairs and it looks like it is already fixed
"upstream".
>
> The proper terminology is for Ethernet link aggregation in the
> the current standard
5 matches
Mail list logo