On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:19 PM Rami Rosen wrote:
> Hi, Alejandro,
>
> Thanks for you quick response.
>
> >When SRIOV is used by VMs, the slow path will always be faster (and
> >with lower latency) with DPDK.
>
> Yes, I am referring primarily to the SRIOV case in my question, when
> assigning PCI
Hi, Alejandro,
Thanks for you quick response.
>When SRIOV is used by VMs, the slow path will always be faster (and
>with lower latency) with DPDK.
Yes, I am referring primarily to the SRIOV case in my question, when
assigning PCI VF to a VM (most likely QEMU VM)
Can you please explain what you m
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:44 AM Rami Rosen wrote:
> Hi Alejandro,
>
> >Your concern is related to this thread
>
> Thanks for your reply, I was aware of this thread.
>
OK
> Still, I am not sure, in current kernels and currently available Ethernet
> DPDK PMDs about the answer to my queries (I don
Hi Alejandro,
>Your concern is related to this thread
Thanks for your reply, I was aware of this thread.
Still, I am not sure, in current kernels and currently available Ethernet
DPDK PMDs about the answer to my queries (I don't think this mail thread
gives info about it), like about what are th
Hi Rami,
Your concern is related to this thread:
http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-January/123466.html
I'm working on solving the problem when PF needs to be bound to VFIO. My
proposal is to use mediated devices.
Although it is not strictly necessary to rely on current kernel WiP about
VFI
5 matches
Mail list logo
