Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test

2021-01-14 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 14/01/2021 14:32, Govindharajan, Hariprasad wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Kevin Traynor >> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 12:03 PM >> To: sta...@dpdk.org >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe ; >> Akhil Goyal ; Ali Alnubani ; >> Walker, Benjamin ; David Christensen >> ; He

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test

2021-01-14 Thread Govindharajan, Hariprasad
> -Original Message- > From: Kevin Traynor > Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 12:03 PM > To: sta...@dpdk.org > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe ; > Akhil Goyal ; Ali Alnubani ; > Walker, Benjamin ; David Christensen > ; Hemant Agrawal ; > Stokes, Ian ; Jerin Jacob ; > Mcnamara, John ;

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test

2021-01-12 Thread Kevin Traynor
Hi, On 17/12/2020 12:03, Kevin Traynor wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 18.11.11. > > The planned date for the final release is 19th January. > The release is planned on the 19th. Please let me know about any other validation testing. Reminder that this i

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test

2021-01-05 Thread Chen, BoX C
Hi Kevin, > Hi Chen Bo, > Thanks for your testing. > > > * Intel(R) Testing > > > > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > > * PF(i40e):Passed > > known issue: create rule for set hash key, but rule create failed. > > Can you please provide some more information. Is there a bugzilla? Is there a > f

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test

2021-01-05 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 23/12/2020 09:41, Pei Zhang wrote: > Hello Kevin, > > The testing with dpdk 18.11.11-rc1 from Red Hat looks good. We tested below > 16 scenarios and and all got PASS on RHEL8: > > (1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS > (2)Guest with device assignment(

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test

2021-01-05 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 29/12/2020 09:01, Chen, BoX C wrote: > Hi Kevin, > Update DPDK 18.11.11 (LTS) test result for Intel part. All passed except the > known issues. > Hi Chen Bo, Thanks for your testing. > * Intel(R) Testing > > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > * PF(i40e):Passed > known issue: create rule fo

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test

2020-12-29 Thread Chen, BoX C
Hi Kevin, Update DPDK 18.11.11 (LTS) test result for Intel part. All passed except the known issues. * Intel(R) Testing # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing * PF(i40e):Passed known issue: create rule for set hash key, but rule create failed. * PF(ixgbe):Passed * VF(i40e):Passed * VF(ixgbe):Passe

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test

2020-12-23 Thread Pei Zhang
Hello Kevin, The testing with dpdk 18.11.11-rc1 from Red Hat looks good. We tested below 16 scenarios and and all got PASS on RHEL8: (1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS (2)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) : PASS (3)G