Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/4] cpu-crypto API choices

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 5:27 PM Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > Hi Jerin, Hi Konstantin, > > Thanks for input, my answers inline. > Other guys - please provide your input. > Thanks > Konstantin > > > > Originally both SW and HW crypto PMDs use rte_crypot_op based API to > > > process the crypto w

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/4] cpu-crypto API choices

Hi Jerin, Thanks for input, my answers inline. Other guys - please provide your input. Thanks Konstantin > > Originally both SW and HW crypto PMDs use rte_crypot_op based API to > > process the crypto workload asynchronously. This way provides uniformity > > to both PMD types, but also introduce

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/4] cpu-crypto API choices

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:11 AM Konstantin Ananyev wrote: > > Originally both SW and HW crypto PMDs use rte_crypot_op based API to > process the crypto workload asynchronously. This way provides uniformity > to both PMD types, but also introduce unnecessary performance penalty to > SW PMDs that ha