Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] doc: change to diverse and inclusive language

2020-06-05 Thread Aaron Conole
Stephen Hemminger writes: > For diversity reasons, the DPDK should take every effort > to eliminate master and slave terminology. The actual code change > is just syntax, but it has bigger impacts. > > Lets announce this now and do it in the next API changing > release. > --- Okay. Usually, I a

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] doc: change to diverse and inclusive language

2020-06-05 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:54:47AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 14:02 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > For diversity reasons, the DPDK should take every effort > > to eliminate master and slave terminology. The actual code change > > is just syntax, but it has bigger impac

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] doc: change to diverse and inclusive language

2020-06-05 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 14:02 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > For diversity reasons, the DPDK should take every effort > to eliminate master and slave terminology. The actual code change > is just syntax, but it has bigger impacts. > > Lets announce this now and do it in the next API changing > re