Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/15] mem: introduce IOVA type

2017-11-06 Thread Thomas Monjalon
06/11/2017 09:51, santosh: > > On Monday 06 November 2017 02:07 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 06/11/2017 06:38, santosh: > >> On Monday 06 November 2017 07:11 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>> The IO virtual addresses may be used instead of physical addresses. > >>> As IOVA is more generic, it sho

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/15] mem: introduce IOVA type

2017-11-06 Thread santosh
On Monday 06 November 2017 02:07 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 06/11/2017 06:38, santosh: >> On Monday 06 November 2017 07:11 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> The IO virtual addresses may be used instead of physical addresses. >>> As IOVA is more generic, it should be used in most places instead >>>

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/15] mem: introduce IOVA type

2017-11-06 Thread Thomas Monjalon
06/11/2017 06:38, santosh: > > On Monday 06 November 2017 07:11 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The IO virtual addresses may be used instead of physical addresses. > > As IOVA is more generic, it should be used in most places instead > > of physical address wording. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Mo

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/15] mem: introduce IOVA type

2017-11-05 Thread santosh
On Monday 06 November 2017 07:11 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > The IO virtual addresses may be used instead of physical addresses. > As IOVA is more generic, it should be used in most places instead > of physical address wording. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- > lib/librte_eal/common/in