19/12/2017 18:10, Matan Azrad:
> There is time between the physical removal of the device until PMDs get
> a RMV interrupt. At this time DPDK PMDs and applications still don't
> know about the removal.
>
> Current removal detection is achieved only by registration to device RMV
> event and the not
.@networkplumber.org]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 7:20 PM
> > > > To: Matan Azrad
> > > > Cc: Adrien Mazarguil ; Thomas
> Monjalon
> > > > ; Gaetan Rivet ;
> > > > dev@dpdk.org
> > > > Subject: R
PM
> > > To: Matan Azrad
> > > Cc: Adrien Mazarguil ; Thomas Monjalon
> > > ; Gaetan Rivet ;
> > > dev@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal
> > > status
> > >
> > > On Tue,
n Rivet ;
> > dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal
> > status
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:10:10 +
> > Matan Azrad wrote:
> >
> > > int
>
HI
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 7:20 PM
> To: Matan Azrad
> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil ; Thomas Monjalon
> ; Gaetan Rivet ;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:10:10 +
Matan Azrad wrote:
> int
> +rte_eth_dev_is_removed(uint16_t port_id)
> +{
> + struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, 0);
> +
> + dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> +
> + RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET
6 matches
Mail list logo
