Hi Alex,
On 05/07/2019 14:37, Alex Kiselev wrote:
пт, 5 июл. 2019 г. в 13:31, Medvedkin, Vladimir :
Hi Stephen,
On 28/06/2019 16:35, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:16:30 +0100
"Medvedkin, Vladimir" wrote:
Hi Honnappa,
On 28/06/2019 14:57, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
Hi a
пт, 5 июл. 2019 г. в 13:31, Medvedkin, Vladimir :
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 28/06/2019 16:35, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:16:30 +0100
> > "Medvedkin, Vladimir" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Honnappa,
> >>
> >> On 28/06/2019 14:57, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
t;> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 23:35
> >> To: Medvedkin, Vladimir
> >> Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli ; Ruifeng
> Wang
> >> (Arm Technology China) ;
> >> bruce.richard...@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology
> >> China) ; nd
> >
@dpdk.org; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology
China) ; nd
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/lpm: not inline unnecessary
functions
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:16:30 +0100
"Medvedkin, Vladimir" wrote:
Hi Honnappa,
On 28/06/2019 14:57, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
Hi all,
On 28/06/2019 05:3
Hi Stephen,
On 28/06/2019 16:35, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:16:30 +0100
"Medvedkin, Vladimir" wrote:
Hi Honnappa,
On 28/06/2019 14:57, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
Hi all,
On 28/06/2019 05:34, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:44:54 +
"Ruifeng Wang (A
; China) ; nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/lpm: not inline unnecessary
> functions
>
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:16:30 +0100
> "Medvedkin, Vladimir" wrote:
>
> > Hi Honnappa,
> >
> > On 28/06/2019 14:57, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:16:30 +0100
"Medvedkin, Vladimir" wrote:
> Hi Honnappa,
>
> On 28/06/2019 14:57, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> On 28/06/2019 05:34, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:44:54 +
> >>> "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" wrote:
Hi Honnappa,
On 28/06/2019 14:57, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
Hi all,
On 28/06/2019 05:34, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:44:54 +
"Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" wrote:
Tests showed that the function inlining caused performance drop on
some x86 platforms with the
> Hi all,
>
> On 28/06/2019 05:34, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:44:54 +
> > "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" wrote:
> >
> >>>
> Tests showed that the function inlining caused performance drop on
> some x86 platforms with the memory ordering patches applie
Hi all,
On 28/06/2019 05:34, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:44:54 +
"Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" wrote:
Tests showed that the function inlining caused performance drop on
some x86 platforms with the memory ordering patches applied.
By force no-inline function
Hi Stephen,
On 27/06/2019 16:24, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:37:49 +0800
Ruifeng Wang wrote:
Tests showed that the function inlining caused performance drop
on some x86 platforms with the memory ordering patches applied.
By force no-inline functions, the performance was be
echnology China) ; nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/lpm: not inline unnecessary
> functions
>
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:44:54 +
> "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" wrote:
>
> > >
> > > > Tests showed that the function inlining
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:44:54 +
"Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" wrote:
> >
> > > Tests showed that the function inlining caused performance drop on
> > > some x86 platforms with the memory ordering patches applied.
> > > By force no-inline functions, the performance was better than be
echnology China) ; nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/lpm: not inline unnecessary
> functions
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:37:49 +0800
> Ruifeng Wang wrote:
>
> > Tests showed that the function inlining caused performance drop on
> > some x86 platforms with t
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:37:49 +0800
Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> Tests showed that the function inlining caused performance drop
> on some x86 platforms with the memory ordering patches applied.
> By force no-inline functions, the performance was better than
> before on x86 and no impact to arm64 platfor
15 matches
Mail list logo
