t any data path checks.
>
> + if (MBUF_NO_SEC_OFFLOAD(pkt) && sa->fallback_sessions > 0) {
>
> + if (pg->id.val & IPSEC_SA_OFFLOAD_FALLBACK_FLAG) {
>
> @maintainers, Marvell is not blocking this feature anymore assuming that the
&g
> > That's a common iteration development approach that is used though
> > > > whole
> > > > DPDK:
> > > > - provide initial solution with basic functionality first
> > > > - improve/extend with future releases/patches
> > >
> &g
d by us.
Thanks,
Anoob
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 4:25 PM
> To: Anoob Joseph ; Smoczynski, MarcinX
> ; akhil.go...@nxp.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran ; Narayana
> Prasad Raju Athreya ; Archana
picture.
So my suggestion to maintainers would be to ignore them as not valuable.
Konstantin
>
> Thanks,
> Anoob
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev On Behalf Of Ananyev, Konstantin
> > Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 8:16 PM
> > To: Ano
being attempted.
Thanks,
Anoob
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 8:16 PM
> To: Anoob Joseph ; Smoczynski, MarcinX
> ; akhil.go...@nxp.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran ; Narayana
> Prasa
Hi Anoob,
> > > > > I've few more observations regarding the proposed feature.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. From what I understood, if an ESP packet ends up on an
> > > > > unprotected interface and doesn't have 'PKT_RX_SEC_OFFLOAD' bit
> > > > > set, then the packet
> > > > would be looked up to see th
; Prasad Raju Athreya ; Archana Muniganti
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] add fallback session
>
>
> Hi Anoob,
>
> > > > I've few more observations regarding the proposed feature.
> > > >
> > > > 1. From what I understoo
Hi Anoob,
> > > I've few more observations regarding the proposed feature.
> > >
> > > 1. From what I understood, if an ESP packet ends up on an unprotected
> > > interface and doesn't have 'PKT_RX_SEC_OFFLOAD' bit set, then the packet
> > would be looked up to see the associated SA and then fal
; Prasad Raju Athreya ; Archana Muniganti
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] add fallback session
>
>
> Hi Anoob,
> Answers/comments inline.
> Marcin, please correct me, if I missed something.
> Konstantin
>
> >
> > Hi Marcin, Konstantin,
>
Hi Anoob,
Answers/comments inline.
Marcin, please correct me, if I missed something.
Konstantin
>
> Hi Marcin, Konstantin,
>
> I've few more observations regarding the proposed feature.
>
> 1. From what I understood, if an ESP packet ends up on an unprotected
> interface and doesn't have 'PK
Hi Marcin, Konstantin,
I've few more observations regarding the proposed feature.
1. From what I understood, if an ESP packet ends up on an unprotected interface
and doesn't have 'PKT_RX_SEC_OFFLOAD' bit set, then the packet would be looked
up to see the associated SA and then fallback session
Joseph, is this patchset ok with you after changes? I've changed second
patch description and sample application documentation regarding this
feature.
> -Original Message-
> From: Smoczynski, MarcinX
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 1:44 PM
> To: ano...@marvell.com; akhil.go...@nxp.com;
12 matches
Mail list logo
