Hi Gabriel,
Thanks for the clarification.
> -Original Message-
> From: Carrillo, Erik G
> Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 8:46 PM
> To: Varghese, Vipin ; rsanf...@akamai.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; techbo...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Varghese, Vipin
> Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 8:39 PM
> To: Carrillo, Erik G ; rsanf...@akamai.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; techbo...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Timer library changes
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> Apolog
Hi Erik,
Apologies if I am reaching out a bit late. Please find my query below
> > This enables primary and secondary processes to modify the same timer
> > list, which enables some multi-process use cases that were not
> > previously possible; e.g. a secondary process can start a timer whose
>
Hi all,
I'd like to bring this patch proposal up again and see if I can get any more
feedback from the maintainer or others.
I need to update the map file to reflect the next release, so I'll add those
changes in if any other modifications are suggested.
Thanks,
Erik
ML: https://mails.dpdk.o
On 2018-12-19 04:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
13/12/2018 23:26, Erik Gabriel Carrillo:
This patch series modifies the timer library in such a way that
structures that used to be statically allocated in a process's data
segment are now allocated in shared memory. As these structures contain
lists
13/12/2018 23:26, Erik Gabriel Carrillo:
> This patch series modifies the timer library in such a way that
> structures that used to be statically allocated in a process's data
> segment are now allocated in shared memory. As these structures contain
> lists of timers, new APIs are introduced that
6 matches
Mail list logo
