On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:12 AM Balazs Nemeth wrote:
> I was also thinking about using the same idea for tx split so that
> virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc can be removed completely. I don't have those
> patches yet. However, I can make virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc use
> virtio_dev_pktmbuf_prep for this
Hi Balazs,
On 4/16/21 11:12 AM, Balazs Nemeth wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I was also thinking about using the same idea for tx split so that
> virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc can be removed completely. I don't have those
> patches yet. However, I can make virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc use
> virtio_dev_pktmbuf_pre
Hi David,
I was also thinking about using the same idea for tx split so that
virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc can be removed completely. I don't have those
patches yet. However, I can make virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc use
virtio_dev_pktmbuf_prep for this patch that addresses the packed
version and submit othe
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:18 AM Balazs Nemeth wrote:
>
> Move allocation out further and perform all allocation in bulk. The same
> goes for freeing packets. In the process, also rename
> virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc to virtio_dev_pktmbuf_prep. This
> function now receives an already allocated mbuf p
On 4/16/21 10:18 AM, Balazs Nemeth wrote:
> Move allocation out further and perform all allocation in bulk. The same
> goes for freeing packets. In the process, also rename
> virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc to virtio_dev_pktmbuf_prep. This
> function now receives an already allocated mbuf pointer.
>
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
