Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows

2020-07-27 Thread Fady Bader
ish...@microsoft.com; ocard...@microsoft.com; > ranjit.me...@intel.com; olivier.m...@6wind.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on > Windows > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:20:48AM +, Fady Bader wrote: > > > > > > > -Origi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows

2020-07-27 Thread Fady Bader
> > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 12:54:08 +, Fady Bader wrote: > > [snip] > > > > Getting the same error with a setup similar to Dmitry's. My setup: > > > > SDK 10.0.18362, > > > > > > I'm sending v4 patch that should resolve this. > > > > > > > clang 9.0.0. What version of clang are you using on you

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows

2020-07-22 Thread Bruce Richardson
asnim Bashar > > ; Tal Shnaiderman ; Yohad Tor > > ; harini.ramakrish...@microsoft.com; > > ocard...@microsoft.com; anand.ra...@intel.com; ranjit.me...@intel.com; > > olivier.m...@6wind.com > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on &

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows

2020-07-22 Thread Fady Bader
...@microsoft.com; anand.ra...@intel.com; ranjit.me...@intel.com; > olivier.m...@6wind.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on > Windows > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 12:54:08 +, Fady Bader wrote: > [snip] > > > Getting the same error

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows

2020-07-20 Thread Dmitry Kozlyuk
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 12:54:08 +, Fady Bader wrote: [snip] > > Getting the same error with a setup similar to Dmitry's. My setup: SDK > > 10.0.18362, > > I'm sending v4 patch that should resolve this. > > > clang 9.0.0. What version of clang are you using on your system? > > You can try inst

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows

2020-07-20 Thread Fady Bader
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows > > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > > > > b/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > > > > index e1bdaf024..05e40a26b 100644 > > > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > > > > +++ b/lib/librte_ea

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows

2020-07-17 Thread Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 09:48:25AM +, Fady Bader wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows > > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > > > b/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > > > index e1bdaf024..05e40a26b 100644 > > > --- a/lib/librte_eal

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows

2020-07-06 Thread Fady Bader
...@microsoft.com; > ocard...@microsoft.com; ranjit.me...@intel.com; olivier.m...@6wind.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on > Windows > > 10/06/2020 14:00, Fady Bader: > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause > > + * Copyrigh

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows

2020-06-28 Thread Fady Bader
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > > b/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > > index e1bdaf024..05e40a26b 100644 > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > > @@ -

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows

2020-06-20 Thread Dmitry Kozlyuk
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > b/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > index e1bdaf024..05e40a26b 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ if is_windows > 'malloc_elem.c', > 'malloc_

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal/windows: librte_net build on Windows

2020-06-16 Thread Thomas Monjalon
10/06/2020 14:00, Fady Bader: > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause > + * Copyright 2020 Mellanox Technologies, Ltd > + */ Isn't it a different copyright? Where does it come from? > + > +#ifndef _IN_H_ > +#define _IN_H_ > + > +#define IPPROTO_IP 0 > +#define IPPROTO_HOPOPTS 0 > +#define