fe, and if it is you can
ignore it.
-Original Message-
From: Ferruh Yigit
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 7:03 PM
To: Jiawen Wu ; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/56] net: txgbe PMD
On 10/5/2020 1:08 PM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
v2: re-order patches and fix some kno
rgument, too.
Should I fix this 'check', or treat it as a false positive?
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ferruh Yigit
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 7:03 PM
> > To: Jiawen Wu ; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/56] net: txgb
k-dev] [PATCH v2 00/56] net: txgbe PMD
On 10/5/2020 1:08 PM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
v2: re-order patches and fix some known problems
v1: introduce txgbe PMD
jiawenwu (56):
net/txgbe: add build and doc infrastructure
net/txgbe: add ethdev probe and remove
net/txgbe: add device init and u
Hi Ferruh,
For the syntax/style check issue, should I fix all the errors and warnings or
just fix the errors?
It seems to be a lot of warnings.
-Original Message-
From: Ferruh Yigit
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 7:03 PM
To: Jiawen Wu ; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2
On 10/5/2020 1:08 PM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
v2: re-order patches and fix some known problems
v1: introduce txgbe PMD
jiawenwu (56):
net/txgbe: add build and doc infrastructure
net/txgbe: add ethdev probe and remove
net/txgbe: add device init and uninit
net/txgbe: add error types and regis
5 matches
Mail list logo
