n Jacob Kollanukkaran ; Archana Muniganti
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add fallback
> session
>
>
> Hi Anoob,
>
> > > > > > Sorry for the late response. But how do you plan to handle
> > > > > > "inl
Hi Anoob,
> > > > > Sorry for the late response. But how do you plan to handle "inline
> > protocol"
> > > > processed packets?
> > > >
> > > > Right now that feature is supported for "inline crypto" only.
> > >
> > > [Anoob] The description says "inline processed" packets. Hence the
> > > conf
n Jacob Kollanukkaran ; Archana Muniganti
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add fallback
> session
>
>
>
> Hi Anoob,
>
> > > > Sorry for the late response. But how do you plan to handle "inline
> protocol"
> &
Hi Anoob,
> > > Sorry for the late response. But how do you plan to handle "inline
> > > protocol"
> > processed packets?
> >
> > Right now that feature is supported for "inline crypto" only.
>
> [Anoob] The description says "inline processed" packets. Hence the confusion.
>
> > For the case
n Jacob Kollanukkaran ; Archana Muniganti
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add fallback
> session
>
>
> Hi Anoob,
>
> >
> > Hi Marcin,
> >
> > Sorry for the late response. But how do you plan to handle "inline prot
Hi Anoob,
>
> Hi Marcin,
>
> Sorry for the late response. But how do you plan to handle "inline protocol"
> processed packets?
Right now that feature is supported for "inline crypto" only.
For the case when SA doesn't enable replay window and/or ESN
current patch should also work for "inline
Hi Marcin,
Sorry for the late response. But how do you plan to handle "inline protocol"
processed packets?
Thanks,
Anoob
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Marcin Smoczynski
> Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 7:47 PM
> To: konstantin.anan...@intel.com; akhil.go...@nxp.com
7 matches
Mail list logo
