Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio-user: fix not working on 32-bit system

2017-09-19 Thread Jim Murphy
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote: > Hi Jim, > > > -Original Message- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jim Murphy > > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 6:24 AM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio-user: fix not wor

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio-user: fix not working on 32-bit system

2017-09-19 Thread Tan, Jianfeng
Hi Jim, > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jim Murphy > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 6:24 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio-user: fix not working on 32-bit > system > > Hi, > > The fix contained in this patch

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio-user: fix not working on 32-bit system

2017-04-18 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 06:21:59AM +, Tan, Jianfeng wrote: > > > > I've expected it to be plain english, something like following: > > > > /* > > * Return the physical address (or virtual address in case of > > * virtio-user) of mbuf data buffer. > > * > > * The addre

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio-user: fix not working on 32-bit system

2017-04-18 Thread Tan, Jianfeng
> -Original Message- > From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 1:54 PM > To: Tan, Jianfeng > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; olivier.m...@6wind.com; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/virtio-user: fix not working on 32-bit system > > On Wed,

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio-user: fix not working on 32-bit system

2017-04-18 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 02:30:33AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote: > virtio-user cannot work on 32-bit system as higher 32-bit of the > addr field (64-bit) in the desc is filled with non-zero value > which should not happen for a 32-bit system. > > In case of virtio-user, we use buf_addr of mbuf to fil