Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: flow rule removal on port stop

2020-11-25 Thread Thomas Monjalon
24/11/2020 15:41, Ajit Khaparde: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 8:15 AM Gregory Etelson wrote: > > > > There is a discrepancy between RTE ETHDEV API and flow rules guide > > regarding flow rules maintenance after port stop. RTE ETHDEV API in > > librte_ethdev.h declares that flow rules will not be sto

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: flow rule removal on port stop

2020-11-24 Thread Ajit Khaparde
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 8:15 AM Gregory Etelson wrote: > > There is a discrepancy between RTE ETHDEV API and flow rules guide > regarding flow rules maintenance after port stop. RTE ETHDEV API in > librte_ethdev.h declares that flow rules will not be stored in PMD > after port stop: > > Quit

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: flow rule removal on port stop

2020-11-24 Thread Thomas Monjalon
There is also a testpmd patch pending about this behaviour: https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/75353/ 22/11/2020 17:55, Thomas Monjalon: > Andrew, any comment on this v2? > (disclosure: I did not read it) > > > 18/11/2020 17:15, Gregory Etelson: > > There is a discrepancy between RTE ETHDEV

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: flow rule removal on port stop

2020-11-22 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Andrew, any comment on this v2? (disclosure: I did not read it) 18/11/2020 17:15, Gregory Etelson: > There is a discrepancy between RTE ETHDEV API and flow rules guide > regarding flow rules maintenance after port stop. RTE ETHDEV API in > librte_ethdev.h declares that flow rules will not be sto