On 12/13/2016 1:54 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 12/12/2016 2:38 PM, Keith Wiles wrote:
>> The PMD allows for DPDK and the host to communicate using a raw
>> device interface on the host and in the DPDK application. The device
>> created is a Tap device with a L2 packet header.
>>
>> v12- Fixup mino
On 12/12/2016 2:38 PM, Keith Wiles wrote:
> The PMD allows for DPDK and the host to communicate using a raw
> device interface on the host and in the DPDK application. The device
> created is a Tap device with a L2 packet header.
>
> v12- Fixup minor changes for driver_name and version number
> v1
> On Dec 12, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Marc wrote:
>
> Keith,
>
> A bit late, but two very high level questions. Do you have performance
> numbers compared to KNI? Did you consider using AF_PACKET PACKET_MMAP which
> could potentially reduce the number of syscalls to 1 for RX and TX of a burst?
Hi M
Keith,
A bit late, but two very high level questions. Do you have performance
numbers compared to KNI? Did you consider using AF_PACKET PACKET_MMAP which
could potentially reduce the number of syscalls to 1 for RX and TX of a
burst?
Marc
On 12 December 2016 at 15:38, Keith Wiles wrote:
> The P
4 matches
Mail list logo
