> -Original Message-
> From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 10:39 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Yigit, Ferruh
> ; dev@dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo
> ; Wu, Jingjing ; Ajit Khaparde
> ; Somnath Kotur
> ; John Daley ; Hyong
> You
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 02:20:34PM +, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> Hi Adrien:
>
> > Hi PMD maintainers, while I'm pretty confident in these changes, I could not
> > validate them with all devices.
> >
> > It would be great if you could apply this patch, run testpmd, create VLAN
> > flow
> > rules wi
Hi Adrien:
> Hi PMD maintainers, while I'm pretty confident in these changes, I could not
> validate them with all devices.
>
> It would be great if you could apply this patch, run testpmd, create VLAN flow
> rules with/without inner EtherType as described and send matching traffic
> while making
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:55:10AM +0200, Nélio Laranjeiro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:56:49PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> > TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not
> > consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is
> > confusing t
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:56:49PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not
> consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is
> confusing to applications.
>
> Problem is that when followed by one of these layers,
5 matches
Mail list logo
