Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/netvsc: not finding VF should not cause failure

2018-12-17 Thread Ferruh Yigit
n Hemminger ; Kevin Traynor >> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/netvsc: not finding VF should not >> cause failure >> >> On 12/14/2018 1:26 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >>> It is possible that the VF device exists but DPDK doesn't know >>

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/netvsc: not finding VF should not cause failure

2018-12-17 Thread Ferruh Yigit
onday, December 17, 2018 2:49 AM > To: Stephen Hemminger ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; Kevin Traynor > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/netvsc: not finding VF should not > cause failure > > On 12/14/2018 1:26 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> It is p

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/netvsc: not finding VF should not cause failure

2018-12-17 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 12/14/2018 1:26 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > It is possible that the VF device exists but DPDK doesn't know > about it. This could happen if device was blacklisted or more > likely the necessary device (Mellanox) was not part of the DPDK > configuration. > > In either case, the right thing to