> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of De Lara Guarch,
> Pablo
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 9:34 AM
> To: Nelio Laranjeiro ; dev@dpdk.org; Olivier
> Matz
> Cc: bor...@mellanox.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2]
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nelio Laranjeiro
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 9:16 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Olivier Matz
> Cc: bor...@mellanox.com
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net: fix ESP header byte ordering definition
>
> ESP heade
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nélio Laranjeiro
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:52 PM
> To: Olivier Matz
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; bor...@mellanox.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net: fix ESP header byte ordering
&g
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 03:24:09PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:15:58AM +0100, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
> > ESP header is defined in the RFC2406 [1] as Big Endian fields it should use
> > the corresponding types in DPDK as well.
> >
> > Fixes: d4b684f7197a ("net: add ESP
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:15:58AM +0100, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
> ESP header is defined in the RFC2406 [1] as Big Endian fields it should use
> the corresponding types in DPDK as well.
>
> Fixes: d4b684f7197a ("net: add ESP header to generic flow steering")
I wonder if we should really mark thi
5 matches
Mail list logo
