Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] devtools: avoid installing static binaries

2020-12-08 Thread Thomas Monjalon
08/12/2020 16:37, David Marchand: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 6:33 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > When testing compilation and checking ABI compatibility, > > there is no real need of static binaries eating disks. > > The static linkage of applications are tested with GCC and Clang, > > plus some

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] devtools: avoid installing static binaries

2020-12-08 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 6:33 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > When testing compilation and checking ABI compatibility, > there is no real need of static binaries eating disks. > The static linkage of applications are tested with GCC and Clang, > plus some examples are statically linked. > The after-in

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] devtools: avoid installing static binaries

2020-12-08 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:12:32PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 07/12/2020 18:47, Bruce Richardson: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:33:19PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > When testing compilation and checking ABI compatibility, > > > there is no real need of static binaries eating disks. > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] devtools: avoid installing static binaries

2020-12-07 Thread Thomas Monjalon
07/12/2020 18:47, Bruce Richardson: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:33:19PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > When testing compilation and checking ABI compatibility, > > there is no real need of static binaries eating disks. > > The static linkage of applications are tested with GCC and Clang, > > pl

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] devtools: avoid installing static binaries

2020-12-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:33:19PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > When testing compilation and checking ABI compatibility, > there is no real need of static binaries eating disks. > The static linkage of applications are tested with GCC and Clang, > plus some examples are statically linked. > The