Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: handle packets with length 0 as usual ones

2017-08-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 8/21/2017 2:08 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Ferruh Yigit > wrote: > > On 8/18/2017 5:23 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Ferruh Yigit

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: handle packets with length 0 as usual ones

2017-08-21 Thread Alejandro Lucero
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 8/18/2017 5:23 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Ferruh Yigit > > wrote: > > > > On 8/11/2017 11:05 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > > A DPDK app could, whateve

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: handle packets with length 0 as usual ones

2017-08-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 8/18/2017 5:23 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Ferruh Yigit > wrote: > > On 8/11/2017 11:05 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > A DPDK app could, whatever the reason, send packets with size 0. > > The PMD is not sendin

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: handle packets with length 0 as usual ones

2017-08-18 Thread Alejandro Lucero
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 8/11/2017 11:05 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > A DPDK app could, whatever the reason, send packets with size 0. > > The PMD is not sending those packets, which does make sense, > > but the problem is the mbuf is not released either. That

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: handle packets with length 0 as usual ones

2017-08-18 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 8/11/2017 11:05 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > A DPDK app could, whatever the reason, send packets with size 0. > The PMD is not sending those packets, which does make sense, > but the problem is the mbuf is not released either. That leads > to mbufs not being available, because the app trusts th