Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: use PCI BDF as the port name

2018-03-01 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/22/2018 9:30 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > It is suggested to use PCI BDF to identify a port for port addition > in OVS-DPDK. While mlx5 has its own naming style: name it by ib dev > name. This breaks the typical OVS DPDK use case and brings more puzzle > to the end users. > > To fix it, this patc

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: use PCI BDF as the port name

2018-01-25 Thread Shahaf Shuler
Tuesday, January 23, 2018 10:24 AM, Nélio Laranjeiro: > Hi Yuanhan, > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:30:06PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > It is suggested to use PCI BDF to identify a port for port addition in > > OVS-DPDK. While mlx5 has its own naming style: name it by ib dev name. > > This breaks

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: use PCI BDF as the port name

2018-01-23 Thread Nélio Laranjeiro
Hi Yuanhan, On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:30:06PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > It is suggested to use PCI BDF to identify a port for port addition > in OVS-DPDK. While mlx5 has its own naming style: name it by ib dev > name. This breaks the typical OVS DPDK use case and brings more puzzle > to the end