On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:06:31PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Hey Adrien,
Hey David!
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:12 PM Adrien Mazarguil
> wrote:
>
> > When passed to the application, Rx packets retain the port ID value
> > originally set by slave devices. Unfortunately these IDs have no mea
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 03:42:24PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/18/2019 2:11 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> > When passed to the application, Rx packets retain the port ID value
> > originally set by slave devices. Unfortunately these IDs have no meaning to
> > applications, which are typically
On 4/18/2019 2:11 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> When passed to the application, Rx packets retain the port ID value
> originally set by slave devices. Unfortunately these IDs have no meaning to
> applications, which are typically unaware of their existence.
>
> This confuses those caring about the
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 03:11:26PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> When passed to the application, Rx packets retain the port ID value
> originally set by slave devices. Unfortunately these IDs have no meaning to
> applications, which are typically unaware of their existence.
>
> This confuses th
Hey Adrien,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:12 PM Adrien Mazarguil
wrote:
> When passed to the application, Rx packets retain the port ID value
> originally set by slave devices. Unfortunately these IDs have no meaning to
> applications, which are typically unaware of their existence.
>
> This confuse
5 matches
Mail list logo