Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/failsafe: fix parameters parsing

2017-08-19 Thread Matan Azrad
Hi Gaetan > -Original Message- > From: Gaëtan Rivet [mailto:gaetan.ri...@6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 12:03 PM > To: Matan Azrad > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam ; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/failsafe: fix parameters parsing > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 06:52:48PM

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/failsafe: fix parameters parsing

2017-08-18 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 06:52:48PM +, Matan Azrad wrote: > Hi Gaetan > > > -Original Message- > > From: Gaëtan Rivet [mailto:gaetan.ri...@6wind.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 7:25 PM > > To: Matan Azrad > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam ; sta...@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH]

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/failsafe: fix parameters parsing

2017-08-17 Thread Matan Azrad
Hi Gaetan > -Original Message- > From: Gaëtan Rivet [mailto:gaetan.ri...@6wind.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 7:25 PM > To: Matan Azrad > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam ; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/failsafe: fix parameters parsing > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 03:54:23PM

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/failsafe: fix parameters parsing

2017-08-17 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 03:54:23PM +, Matan Azrad wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Gaëtan Rivet [mailto:gaetan.ri...@6wind.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 6:26 PM > > To: Matan Azrad > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam ; sta...@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/fail

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/failsafe: fix parameters parsing

2017-08-17 Thread Matan Azrad
> -Original Message- > From: Gaëtan Rivet [mailto:gaetan.ri...@6wind.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 6:26 PM > To: Matan Azrad > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam ; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/failsafe: fix parameters parsing > > Hi Matan, > > Thanks for spotting the bug.

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/failsafe: fix parameters parsing

2017-08-17 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
Hi Matan, Thanks for spotting the bug. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 05:19:41PM +0300, Matan Azrad wrote: > The corrupted code used wrongly snprintf return value as the > number of characters actually copied, in spite of the meanning > is the number of characters which would be generated for the > give