Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim maintainership of ipc

2019-05-03 Thread Thomas Monjalon
25/04/2019 15:17, Anatoly Burakov: > IPC is a big part of secondary process infrastructure now, > and I have been de-facto maintainer for it since 18.05. > Update MAINTAINERS file to match. > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov > --- > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ F: d

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim maintainership of ipc

2019-04-25 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 25-Apr-19 4:17 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 25-Apr-19 2:26 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 25/04/2019 15:17, Anatoly Burakov: IPC is a big part of secondary process infrastructure now, and I have been de-facto maintainer for it since 18.05. Update MAINTAINERS file to match. Signed-off-by: Anat

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim maintainership of ipc

2019-04-25 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 25-Apr-19 2:26 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 25/04/2019 15:17, Anatoly Burakov: IPC is a big part of secondary process infrastructure now, and I have been de-facto maintainer for it since 18.05. Update MAINTAINERS file to match. Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov --- --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTA

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim maintainership of ipc

2019-04-25 Thread Thomas Monjalon
25/04/2019 15:17, Anatoly Burakov: > IPC is a big part of secondary process infrastructure now, > and I have been de-facto maintainer for it since 18.05. > Update MAINTAINERS file to match. > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov > --- > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ F: d