> Windows compilation is failing in CI, apparently Windows doesn't
> understand "off_t".
>
> Should we add an "rte_off_t" definition for non-POSIX portability?
On second thought, it's probably better to simply use uint64_t.
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 2:10 PM Lance Richardson
wrote:
>
> For 32-bit targets, size_t is normally a 32-bit type and
> does not have sufficient range to represent 64-bit offsets
> that can are needed when mapping PCI addresses. Use off_t
> instead, which is usually a 64-bit type when compiled with
2 matches
Mail list logo
