On 11/11/2017 8:30 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 26/09/2017 09:17, Stephen Hemminger:
>> The DPDK needs to stay up to date with current LTS Linux kernel support.
>> If the kernel is older than LTS it is likely to be insecure and buggy.
>> Therefore only require DPDK to work on oldest LTS kernel.
>>
26/09/2017 09:17, Stephen Hemminger:
> The DPDK needs to stay up to date with current LTS Linux kernel support.
> If the kernel is older than LTS it is likely to be insecure and buggy.
> Therefore only require DPDK to work on oldest LTS kernel.
>
> If distribution vendors want to support DPDK on o
On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 15:49 +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
> > Hemminger
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8:17 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Stephen Hemminger
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: u
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 08:17 +0100, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The DPDK needs to stay up to date with current LTS Linux kernel
> support.
> If the kernel is older than LTS it is likely to be insecure and
> buggy.
> Therefore only require DPDK to work on oldest LTS kernel.
>
> If distribution vendor
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8:17 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update oldest supported kernel
>
> The DPDK needs to stay up to date with
5 matches
Mail list logo