Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add Linux rawio capability requirement in mlx5 guide

2021-04-01 Thread Thomas Monjalon
01/04/2021 14:06, Eli Britstein: > On 4/1/2021 2:39 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > About the title: "rawio" is not a word. > > "raw IO" would be better. > > It was meant for cap_sys_rawio. As underscores are not allowed in the > title, I used "rawio". > > I think "raw IO" misses that meaning. Wh

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add Linux rawio capability requirement in mlx5 guide

2021-04-01 Thread Eli Britstein
On 4/1/2021 2:39 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: External email: Use caution opening links or attachments +Cc mlx5 maintainers About the title: "rawio" is not a word. "raw IO" would be better. It was meant for cap_sys_rawio. As underscores are not allowed in the title, I used "rawio". I thin

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add Linux rawio capability requirement in mlx5 guide

2021-04-01 Thread Thomas Monjalon
+Cc mlx5 maintainers About the title: "rawio" is not a word. "raw IO" would be better. 01/04/2021 09:49, Eli Britstein: > For an application to be able to create "transfer" rte_flows for mlx5 What is "tranfer" rule? rte_flows does not exist. You probably mean rte_flow rule. > devices, it shoul