On 5/6/20 1:37 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:51 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
3) if yes, Please fix RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP(net_virtio, "* igb_uio
| uio_pci_generic | vfio-pci");
>>>
>>> While support gets removed, what about:
>>>
>>> RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP(net_vi
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:51 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > 3) if yes, Please fix RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP(net_virtio, "* igb_uio
> > > | uio_pci_generic | vfio-pci");
> >
> > While support gets removed, what about:
> >
> > RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP(net_virtio, "* igb_uio | uio_pci_generic |
> > vfi
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 1:23 PM Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/6/20 8:43 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:05 PM Maxime Coquelin
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 5/5/20 6:16 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:50 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
> >>
> >
On 5/6/20 8:43 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:05 PM Maxime Coquelin
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 5/5/20 6:16 PM, David Marchand wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:50 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
>>
>> Removing this special case could break x86 applications running with
>>>
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:05 PM Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 5/5/20 6:16 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:50 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
>
> Removing this special case could break x86 applications running with
> legacy virtio.
>
>
> On the pl
Hi,
On 5/5/20 6:16 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:50 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
Removing this special case could break x86 applications running with
legacy virtio.
On the plus side, we have been announcing for some time in virtio:
RTE_PMD_REGIST
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:50 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > >
> > > Removing this special case could break x86 applications running with
> > > legacy virtio.
> > >
> > >
> > > On the plus side, we have been announcing for some time in virtio:
> > > RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP(net_virtio, "* igb_uio | uio_
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 3:04 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 2:21 PM David Marchand
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 10:06 PM Thomas Monjalon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > 26/04/2020 20:41, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:38 PM Thomas Monjalon
> > > > wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 2:21 PM David Marchand
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 10:06 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > 26/04/2020 20:41, Jerin Jacob:
> > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:38 PM Thomas Monjalon
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 26/04/2020 19:38, jer...@marvell.com:
> > > > > From: Jeri
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 10:06 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 26/04/2020 20:41, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:38 PM Thomas Monjalon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > 26/04/2020 19:38, jer...@marvell.com:
> > > > From: Jerin Jacob
> > > >
> > > > If the PCI device is not attached to any driver
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:36 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 26/04/2020 20:41, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:38 PM Thomas Monjalon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > 26/04/2020 19:38, jer...@marvell.com:
> > > > From: Jerin Jacob
> > > >
> > > > If the PCI device is not attached to any driver t
26/04/2020 20:41, Jerin Jacob:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:38 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > 26/04/2020 19:38, jer...@marvell.com:
> > > From: Jerin Jacob
> > >
> > > If the PCI device is not attached to any driver then there is no
> > > point in probing it. As an optimization, skip the PCI d
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:38 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 26/04/2020 19:38, jer...@marvell.com:
> > From: Jerin Jacob
> >
> > If the PCI device is not attached to any driver then there is no
> > point in probing it. As an optimization, skip the PCI device probe if
> > the PCI device driver of t
26/04/2020 19:38, jer...@marvell.com:
> From: Jerin Jacob
>
> If the PCI device is not attached to any driver then there is no
> point in probing it. As an optimization, skip the PCI device probe if
> the PCI device driver of type RTE_KDRV_NONE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob
> ---
> Notes:
> -
14 matches
Mail list logo