Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: set RTE_ARCH_64 based on pointer size

2019-02-26 Thread Thomas Monjalon
26/09/2018 12:18, Luca Boccassi: > On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 10:15 +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > Rather than relying on the target machine architecture, use the > > size of a pointer from the compiler to determine if we are 64-bits > > or not. This allows correct behaviour when you pass -m32 as a

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: set RTE_ARCH_64 based on pointer size

2019-02-19 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 10:15 +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > Rather than relying on the target machine architecture, use the > size of a pointer from the compiler to determine if we are 64-bits > or not. This allows correct behaviour when you pass -m32 as a compile > option. It also allows us to us

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: set RTE_ARCH_64 based on pointer size

2018-09-26 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 10:15 +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > Rather than relying on the target machine architecture, use the > size of a pointer from the compiler to determine if we are 64-bits > or not. This allows correct behaviour when you pass -m32 as a compile > option. It also allows us to us

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: set RTE_ARCH_64 based on pointer size

2018-09-26 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:15:36AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > Rather than relying on the target machine architecture, use the > size of a pointer from the compiler to determine if we are 64-bits > or not. This allows correct behaviour when you pass -m32 as a compile > option. It also allows u