06/05/2022 17:39, Bruce Richardson пишет:
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 09:33:41AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2022 16:28:41 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:12:32PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:59:32PM +, Honnappa N
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 09:33:41AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2022 16:28:41 +0100
> Bruce Richardson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:12:32PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:59:32PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wro
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 08:41:12AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2022 00:24:34 -0700
> Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:59:32PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > > Thanks Stephen. Do you see any performance difference with this change?
> >
> > as a
On Fri, 6 May 2022 16:28:41 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:12:32PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:59:32PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > > > Thanks Stephen. Do you see any performance difference with this cha
On Fri, 6 May 2022 00:24:34 -0700
Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:59:32PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > Thanks Stephen. Do you see any performance difference with this change?
>
> as a matter of due diligence i think a comparison should be made just
> to be confiden
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:12:32PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:59:32PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > > Thanks Stephen. Do you see any performance difference with this change?
> >
> > as a matter of due diligence i think a comparison should be
>
> On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:59:32PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > Thanks Stephen. Do you see any performance difference with this change?
>
> as a matter of due diligence i think a comparison should be made just to be
> confident nothing is regressing.
>
> i support this change in p
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:59:32PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> Thanks Stephen. Do you see any performance difference with this change?
as a matter of due diligence i think a comparison should be made just
to be confident nothing is regressing.
i support this change in principal since it
>
> > Thanks Stephen. Do you see any performance difference with this change?
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Stephen Hemminger
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 5:46 PM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Stephen Hemminger
> > > Subject: [RFC] rte_ring: don't use always inline
>
On Thu, 5 May 2022 16:10:27 -0700
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2022 22:59:32 +
> Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
> > Thanks Stephen. Do you see any performance difference with this change?
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Stephen Hemminger
> > > Sent: Thursday,
On Thu, 5 May 2022 22:59:32 +
Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> Thanks Stephen. Do you see any performance difference with this change?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Hemminger
> > Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 5:46 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Stephen Hemminger
> > Subjec
Thanks Stephen. Do you see any performance difference with this change?
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 5:46 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger
> Subject: [RFC] rte_ring: don't use always inline
>
> Forcing compiler to inline with
12 matches
Mail list logo
