On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 06:32:45 +0400 (+04)
Ivan Malov wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2025, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > In new model, the packet was already copied, only need
>
> Copied? But what if it was "indirect attached" instead, as the model
> envisages?
>
> Perhaps this is
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025, Ivan Malov wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
In new model, the packet was already copied, only need
Copied? But what if it was "indirect attached" instead, as the model
envisages?
Perhaps this is a silly question of mine, but it may not
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
In new model, the packet was already copied, only need
Copied? But what if it was "indirect attached" instead, as the model envisages?
Perhaps this is a silly question of mine, but it may not be clear what happens
in case of 'RTE_ETH_
3 matches
Mail list logo
