09/02/2022 12:04, David Marchand:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 6:26 AM wrote:
> >
> > From: Rohit Raj
> >
> > As per the current code we have API for bus probe, but the
> > bus close API is missing. This breaks the multi process
> > scenarios as objects are not cleaned while terminating the
> > seco
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 6:26 AM wrote:
>
> From: Rohit Raj
>
> As per the current code we have API for bus probe, but the
> bus close API is missing. This breaks the multi process
> scenarios as objects are not cleaned while terminating the
> secondary processes.
After an application crash, how
01/02/2022 06:40, Rohit Raj:
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> > 20/01/2022 15:51, Rohit Raj:
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > > This "rte_bus_close" API is introduced to do the opposite of what
> > "rte_bus_probe" does. Just like there are plug and unplug APIs for plugging
> > and
> > unplugging a single devi
; Sachin Saxena
> ; Hemant Agrawal ;
> ferruh.yi...@intel.com; david.march...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] eal: add API for bus close
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> 20/01/2022 15:51, Rohit Raj:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > This "rte_bus_close&quo
20/01/2022 15:51, Rohit Raj:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> This "rte_bus_close" API is introduced to do the opposite of what
> "rte_bus_probe" does. Just like there are plug and unplug APIs for plugging
> and unplugging a single device.
>
> The API you mentioned, "rte_dev_remove" supports only rte_device.
aj
> Cc: Bruce Richardson ; Ray Kinsella
> ; Dmitry Kozlyuk ; Narcisa Ana
> Maria Vasile ; Dmitry Malloy
> ; Pallavi Kadam ;
> dev@dpdk.org; Nipun Gupta ; Sachin Saxena
> ; Hemant Agrawal ;
> ferruh.yi...@intel.com; david.march...@redhat.com
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 1/2]
Hi,
10/01/2022 06:26, rohit@nxp.com:
> From: Rohit Raj
>
> As per the current code we have API for bus probe, but the
> bus close API is missing. This breaks the multi process
> scenarios as objects are not cleaned while terminating the
> secondary processes.
>
> This patch adds a new API r
7 matches
Mail list logo
