>> > > mbuf physical address field is not used in builds which only uses VA. It
>> > > is used to expand the dynamic field area.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton
>> >
>> > We cannot condition the use of the dynamic field.
>> > I think it is enough justification to reject this patch.
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:52:47 +0200
Olivier Matz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 09:24:51AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 21/09/2022 15:56, Shijith Thotton:
> > > mbuf physical address field is not used in builds which only uses VA. It
> > > is used to expand the dynamic field area.
> > >
28/09/2022 14:52, Olivier Matz:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 09:24:51AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 21/09/2022 15:56, Shijith Thotton:
> > > mbuf physical address field is not used in builds which only uses VA. It
> > > is used to expand the dynamic field area.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shijit
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 09:24:51AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 21/09/2022 15:56, Shijith Thotton:
> > mbuf physical address field is not used in builds which only uses VA. It
> > is used to expand the dynamic field area.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton
>
> We cannot condition the use
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 07:26:18PM +0530, Shijith Thotton wrote:
> mbuf physical address field is not used in builds which only uses VA. It
> is used to expand the dynamic field area.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton
> ---
> lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h | 26 +-
> lib/
21/09/2022 15:56, Shijith Thotton:
> mbuf physical address field is not used in builds which only uses VA. It
> is used to expand the dynamic field area.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton
We cannot condition the use of the dynamic field.
I think it is enough justification to reject this patch.
6 matches
Mail list logo