Hi Jeremy, sorry for the delay! See my comments below.
> > > Assumptions:
> > > Two links between SUT and TG, one link is TG -> SUT, the
> > > other SUT -> TG.
> > >
> > > Args:
> > > -packet: The packet to modify.
> > > +packets: The packet
Thanks for the comments, I just had one clarifying question about
them, but otherwise I will address them in the next version.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 3:00 PM Nicholas Pratte wrote:
>
> I'll make sure to look over the other parts of this series and leave
> reviews at some point next week, but I p
I'll make sure to look over the other parts of this series and leave
reviews at some point next week, but I prioritized this since I will
be using this patch at some point in my GRE suites.
> diff --git a/dts/framework/test_suite.py b/dts/framework/test_suite.py
> index 694b2eba65..0b678ed62d 100
This is great, I'll be using this in-favor of the boolean solution
that I implemented! Just to bring this to your attention. I am
currently working on some Generic Routing Encapsulation suites the
require multiple IP layers at packet creation; they look something
like:
Ether() / IP() / GRE() / IP(
4 matches
Mail list logo
