> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2023 01.22
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:16:35 -0800
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > _Static_assert(!(0 != 0), "RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_UNKNOWN != 0");
>
> Looks like a clang bug, or something about the ot
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:16:35 -0800
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> _Static_assert(!(0 != 0), "RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_UNKNOWN != 0");
Looks like a clang bug, or something about the other compiler flags
because compiling just this part is fine.
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 14:28:55 -0800
Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 02:13:26PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:06:04 -0800
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> > > The macro RTE_MIN has some hidden assignments to provide type
> > > safety which means th
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 14:28:55 -0800
Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 02:13:26PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:06:04 -0800
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> > > The macro RTE_MIN has some hidden assignments to provide type
> > > safety which means th
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 02:13:26PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:06:04 -0800
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > The macro RTE_MIN has some hidden assignments to provide type
> > safety which means the statement can not be fully evaluted in
> > first pass of compiler. Repl
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:06:04 -0800
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The macro RTE_MIN has some hidden assignments to provide type
> safety which means the statement can not be fully evaluted in
> first pass of compiler. Replace RTE_MIN() with equivalent macro.
>
> This will cause errors from checkpatc
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:06:04AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The macro RTE_MIN has some hidden assignments to provide type
> safety which means the statement can not be fully evaluted in
> first pass of compiler. Replace RTE_MIN() with equivalent macro.
>
> This will cause errors from chec
7 matches
Mail list logo